Comments on: From Cross Creek to … Abortion? http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/ A Devoted Nephew's Biased Study of Florida's Most Fascinating Lawsuit Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:07:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: SALVADOR http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5435 SALVADOR Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:36:22 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5435 <strong><b><a href="http://www.box.net/view_shared/nacetk0sky?ml=id actonel@risk" rel="nofollow">..</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buyit now... ..…

Buyit now…

]]> By: LYNN http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5402 LYNN Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:11:54 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5402 <strong><b><a href="http://www.box.net/view_shared/jly1nka0mz?ml=id premarin@cream.comments" rel="nofollow">...</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buyit now... premarin@cream.comments” rel=”nofollow”>……

Buyit now…

]]> By: LEROY http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5388 LEROY Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:55:45 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5388 <strong><b><a href="http://www.box.net/view_shared/vspc76lpk3?ml=id dosage@of.abilify" rel="nofollow">..</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buynow it... dosage@of.abilify” rel=”nofollow”>..…

Buynow it…

]]> By: HECTOR http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5353 HECTOR Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:17:30 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5353 <strong><b><a href="http://www.box.net/view_shared/4dhvkdejom?ml=id order@altace.cod" rel="nofollow">..</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buynow... order@altace.cod” rel=”nofollow”>..…

Buynow…

]]> By: MARK http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5281 MARK Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:11:23 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5281 <strong><b><a href="http://www.box.net/view_shared/mpcy7o3u8h?ml=id retin@a.cheap.no.prescription" rel="nofollow">..</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buygeneric drugs... retin@a.cheap.no.prescription” rel=”nofollow”>..…

Buygeneric drugs…

]]> By: PHILIP http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5265 PHILIP Sun, 03 Apr 2011 07:01:21 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5265 <strong><b><a href="http://www.box.net/view_shared/054g4g1blh?ml=id chantix@vs.zyban" rel="nofollow">..</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buyit now... chantix@vs.zyban” rel=”nofollow”>..…

Buyit now…

]]> By: RICKY http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5203 RICKY Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:16:03 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5203 <strong><b><a href="http://www.box.net/view_shared/9l1679zm0b?ml=id order@protonix" rel="nofollow">...</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buygeneric meds... ……

Buygeneric meds…

]]> By: ANDY http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5125 ANDY Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:56:49 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5125 <strong><b><a href="http://www.eoearth.org/profile/Spiriva21591?ml=id Spiriva@Spiriva.Spiriva" rel="nofollow">..</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buyno prescription... Spiriva@Spiriva.Spiriva” rel=”nofollow”>..…

Buyno prescription…

]]> By: ADRIAN http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-5116 ADRIAN Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:18:49 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-5116 <strong><b><a href="http://www.eoearth.org/profile/Synthroid96384?ml=id Synthroid@Synthroid.Synthroid" rel="nofollow">..</a></b></blockquote>...</strong> Buynow it... Synthroid@Synthroid.Synthroid” rel=”nofollow”>..…

Buynow it…

]]> By: Kemp Brinson http://crosscreektrial.com/2009/11/from-cross-creek-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Kemp Brinson Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:29:45 +0000 http://crosscreektrial.com/?p=71#comment-12 Was that last line directed at me? Your case of interest (I think, I have not read the opinion) has to do with the TORT of invasion of privacy which is rooted in the common law. It is the right of one private person to sue another private person for invading one's privacy. The Roe v. Wade decision is founded on a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT not to have the government restrict private conduct. Although they both use the word "privacy" they are two entirely different legal concepts. One is a cause of action among private individuals, the other a limit on what a government is able to do. One is founded in the common law, the other on constitutional concepts. I am much more of a legal pragmatist than a scholar, but I will venture to say that these two decisions MIGHT follow from the same ancient common law principles that came over on the boat that landed at Jamestown. Perhaps they share a common ancestor, in the same sense that apples and oranges do. It is unlikely that one could draw a line from your case to Roe v. Wade in any coherent way without going way back in time before coming forward again. That's more of a strong hunch than a rock solid conclusion. With respect to the more broad question, which is more interesting and answerable, the best place to start would be to Shepardize the appellate opinion and start reading. Was that last line directed at me?

Your case of interest (I think, I have not read the opinion) has to do with the TORT of invasion of privacy which is rooted in the common law. It is the right of one private person to sue another private person for invading one’s privacy.

The Roe v. Wade decision is founded on a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT not to have the government restrict private conduct.

Although they both use the word “privacy” they are two entirely different legal concepts. One is a cause of action among private individuals, the other a limit on what a government is able to do. One is founded in the common law, the other on constitutional concepts.

I am much more of a legal pragmatist than a scholar, but I will venture to say that these two decisions MIGHT follow from the same ancient common law principles that came over on the boat that landed at Jamestown. Perhaps they share a common ancestor, in the same sense that apples and oranges do. It is unlikely that one could draw a line from your case to Roe v. Wade in any coherent way without going way back in time before coming forward again. That’s more of a strong hunch than a rock solid conclusion.

With respect to the more broad question, which is more interesting and answerable, the best place to start would be to Shepardize the appellate opinion and start reading.

]]> ?>